Saturday, October 28, 2006

Cube Field Runner Retro

end of third year.

IES en Lenguas Vivas "Juan Ramón Fernández" - November 2006
EVALUATION OF THE "QUALITY EDUCATION" FOR THIRD YEAR

Slogans: I Read the story
Continuity of Parks by Julio Cortazar, below

CONTINUITY OF PARKS

Julio Cortazar had begun reading the novel a few days. The urgent business left, opened it again when returning by train to the farm, is slowly leaving interest in the plot, by drawing the characters. That evening, after writing a letter to his attorney and discuss with the butler a matter of sharecropping, again the book in the quiet of his study which looked into the park of oak trees. Sprawled in his favorite chair, his back to the door that had bothered him as an irritating intrusion possible, let your left hand again and again caress the velvet green and began to read the last chapters. His memory retained without effort the names and pictures of the characters, the fictional illusion him almost immediately. Enjoyed the almost perverse pleasure of going line by line ripping his surroundings, and feel the time your head resting comfortably in the high-backed velvet, that cigarettes were at hand, that beyond the windows dancing the evening air under the oaks. Word by word, absorbed by the sordid dilemma of the hero, letting go the images were arranged and took on color and movement, he witnessed the last meeting in the mountain cabin. The woman arrived first, apprehensive; now the lover came, his face cut by the backlash of a branch. Admirably licked her blood with her kisses, but he rebuffed her caresses, he had not come to repeat the ceremonies of a secret passion, protected by a world of dry leaves and furtive paths. The dagger warmed to his chest, and underneath liberty pounded squat. Panting dialogue raced down the pages as a rivulet of snakes, and felt that everything is decided from eternity. To those caresses entangling lover's body as if to keep him and dissuade him abominably drew the figure of another body that was necessary to destroy. Nothing had been forgotten: alibis, unforeseen hazards, possible mistakes. Since that time each instant had its use carefully allocated. Merciless review twice interrupted only for a hand caressing his cheek. Began to get dark.
But look now, rigidly fixed to the task which awaited them, they separated at the cabin door. She was to follow the path that led north. From the opposite way he became a moment to watch her run with her hair loose. He ran in turn, crouching in the trees and hedges, to distinguish in the fog of dusk the mall leading to the house. Dogs should not bark and no bark. The steward would not be at that hour, and was not. He went up the three porch steps and entered. From the blood in his ears galloping came the woman's words, first a blue room, then a gallery, a carpeted stairway. At the top, two doors. No one in the first room, no one in the second. The door of the room, and then the sword in hand, the light from the windows, the high back of a green velvet chair, the man's head on the couch reading a novel.
(volume: End of game, in: Collected Stories I, Bs.Aires, ed. Alfaguara, 1997, 1 ed.arg., 2 nd Reprint., Pp.291 sg.)

II. Conduct a critical literary essay about the story of between 500 and 1000 words (approx. two pages maximum). Not be considered in this count, neither the title nor the footnotes. Nor does the obligatory marking bibliography.

III. References are obligatory three received theoretical-practical modules, particularly the two modules (for use of the essential technical vocabulary of employment) and three (argumentative discourse-test)
III.a. Can used as more specific references, the essay contained Bernades Sonia in module III, and will be cited in References
III.b. Other literature to be used, shall refer to it both in footnotes and in References (according to guidelines received)
III.B.1. In the case of using Internet-drop literature fully admissible, "is that respect be considered as valid only those that respond with fidelity to the source (author and place of publication with serious source that ensures their accuracy and level academic, etc.).. In no way be accepted as a true source, the appearance of sites as the corner of vago.com, monographs. com., etc.

IV. Delivery will be made in accordance with the following guidelines:
IV.a. In Word, phorate A4 page, Arial 12. to justify both margins
IV.A .1. Name of student and course, printed on each page
IV.A.2. The work will be delivered before 10 November (Delivery may be made before but not after) the teacher in charge of the matter and / or teachers and Ana M. Paola Gioseffi Belvedere, at the times have been ad hoc for this project
V. You will be evaluated using the following parameters (which, review the following items before submitting your work)




FINAL EVALUATION OF THE "QUALITY EDUCATION" FOR THIRD YEAR
Student Name: Course and division: Always Sometimes Never

A. Correspondence with the characteristics of the discourse genre

A.1.Respeto by the structure expected (hypothesis, developing thesis)
A.2.Pertinencia of the hypothesis and his approach A.3.Desarrollo
complete with sufficient arguments
A. $. Membership of the thesis in relation to the hypothesis
A.5 . Include relevant quotations and / or examples
A.6.Personalización speech improper Bibliographic A.7.Cita
correct, if applicable
A.8.Cumplimiento with the requested format

B. Style (recurrence of errors) Always Sometimes Never
B.!. B.2.Ortografía
Organization paragraphs and punctuation syntax
B.3.Problemas general use connectors
B.4.Buen
B.5.Buen enclitic pronoun use B.6.Concordancia

correct gerund B.7.Empleo
B.8.Uso of general vocabulary and verbal B.9.Coherencia

global B.10.Coherencia
B.11.Aparición of anacolutha (Coherent sentence)
B.12.Repeticiones
B.13.Otros unnecessary recurring problems

APPROVED WORK
DEPRECATED (REDO)

0 comments:

Post a Comment